Jain Vs. State of U.P.& ANR.  INSC 1308 (29 July 2009)
APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1430-1434 OF 2009 [Arising out of
SLP(Crl.) Nos. 3930-3934/2008] GANPAT JAIN ... APPELLANT(S) :VERSUS:
heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and keeping in
view the limited nature of the notice issued by this Court, we are of the
opinion that interest of justice would be sub-served if either the Court of Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzjaffarnagar or the Court where the matter may be
transferred, fixes a particular date of hearing and informs both the parties
thereabout and then the trial of the case is conducted on day-to-day basis. We,
therefore, direct accordingly.
order is being passed keeping in view the fact that the appellant is a resident
of Bangalore and the case involves seven cheques.
attention was drawn to an order dated 12.1.2009 passed by the learned Single
Judge of the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 36316/2008.
Sanyal, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits
that from a perusal of the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition it would appear that
the appellant has not disclosed therein that this Court is in seisen of the
matter. We would request the learned Single Judge to dispose of the said
criminal miscellaneous petition and other connected matters, as expeditiously
as possible and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
appeals are disposed of with the aforementioned observations and directions.
.......................J (S.B. SINHA)
.......................J (DEEPAK VERMA)
JULY 30, 2009.