Satish Chander Gupta and
Sons Vs. M/S.Klick Nixon Ltd. & ANR.  INSC 429 (26 February 2009)
JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6151 OF 2001 Satish Chander Gupta & Sons
...Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Klick Nixon Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondent(s) O R D
E R Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This appeal has been
filed against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
[for short, "the National Commission"] dated 13th April, 2000. The
said impugned order reads as follows:
"We have gone
through the merits of the case. We agree with the view expressed by the State
Commission. The Revision Petition is dismissed."
A perusal of the
above order shows that no reasons have been given therein. In our opinion, even
in an order of affirmance, some reasons ought to be recorded, which need not be
as elaborate as orders passed by the District Forum or the State Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission. Hence, we set aside the impugned order and
remand the matter to the National Commission for decision afresh after hearing
the parties in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
The civil appeal is,