AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Supreme Court Judgments


Latest Supreme Court of India Judgments 2018

Subscribe

RSS Feed img








Jagdish Prasad Vs. Shiv Nath & ANR. [2008] INSC 1517 (8 September 2008)

Judgment

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5587 OF 2008 [Arising out of SLP(C)No. 25716/2007] JAGDISH PRASAD ... APPELLANT(S) :VERSUS:

ORDER Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

The High Court in passing the impugned judgment has committed a factual error in so far as it proceeded on the basis that the suit filed by the respondents herein was one under Section 77 of the Registration Act. Admittedly the suit was one for specific performance of contract. Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 confers a legal right on a subsequent purchaser for value, without notice, to be impleaded as a party if the transaction is found to be bona fide.

..2/- .2.

This aspect of the matter has been considered by this Court in Kasturi vs. Iyyamperumal & Ors., [2005 (6) SCC 733]. In this view of the matter, there cannot be any doubt whatsoever, that as the appellant has a right to be impleaded as a party.

The said prayer, therefore, should not have been rejected.

For the reasons aforementioned, the impugned judgment is set aside and the appeal is allowed. No costs.

..........................J. (S.B. SINHA)

..........................J. (CYRIAC JOSEPH)

NEW DELHI,

SEPTEMBER 8, 2008.

 Back


 



Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered by nubia  |  driven by neosys