Seema Bansal Vs.
Mayank Bansal  INSC 1750 (16 October 2008)
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.683 OF 2007
Smt. Seema Bansal ...Petitioner Versus Dr. Mayank Bansal ...Respondent
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT,
the present transfer petition has been filed for transfer of a case from
Lalitpur to Delhi, the matter was directed to be listed at the Supreme Court
Lok Adalat which was held on 6th September, 2008, to explore the possibility of
bringing out a solution to the marital discords.
With the assistance
of the Mediators, the parties were heard and following terms for settling the
disputes were arrived at:
the respondent shall pay a sum of Rs.10 lacs towards maintenance of the
daughter (Tanishka). The said sum will be payable in annul instalment of Rs.2.5
lacs each payable on or before 31st August. The first instalment to be paid on
or before 31.8.2009. The fourth and last instalment shall be paid on or before
above amount shall be kept in a fixed deposit in the name of Ms. Taniksha.
a. Till such amount of
Rs.10 lacs is paid, the respondent shall pay a monthly sum of Rs.7500/- (Rupees
seven thousand five hundred only) by the end of each month commencing from
b. That the petitioner
will not be claiming any sums towards alimony and/or maintenance except that
she will be 2 entitled to her share of 25% in the immoveable property bearing
No.1301, Jaj Bagh, Manja Pachora, Opposite Gate No.2, Medical College, Jhani.
parties hereby agree to withdraw all the civil/criminal cases pending in the
concerned court which are mentioned below:
(1) O.S. No.161 of
2007 (Dr. Mayank Bansal pending before Ld. Civil Judge, Ms. Seema, Senior
Division, Lalitpur, U.P.) (2) Criminal Complaint arising from FIR No.605 of
2007 u/s 406, 498A IPC, PS Pandav Nagar, Delhi.
(3) HMA No.7005/07
u/s 125 Cr.P.C. pending before Ms. Neeraj Shatiya, Civil Judge, Karkadooma,
Respondent will be entitled to visitation rights to meet the daughter Tanishka
on 2nd and 4th Sunday of each month with prior notice by each party. The
Respondent will be entitled to take the child on an outing during such visits.
The Respondent will drop the child back in such event.
Respondent will also be entitled to meet the child on or other special
occasions subject to availability.
petitioner submits that the particulars of the immoveable property mentioned
above have not been verified by her and the same are subject to verification.
2. In terms of the
agreement at serial no.3 (a), a draft of Rs.7,500/- for the month of September,
2008, has been handed over to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in
3. In view of the
aforesaid agreement the transfer petition is disposed of on the terms as set
out above. The proceedings as noted above stand closed.
(Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT)