Juglal & ANR. Vs. State of Haryana  INSC 841 (8 May 2008)
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.322 OF 2007 Juglal & Anr. ...Appellant(s) Versus State
of Haryana ...Respondent(s) With Criminal Appeal No.539 of 2007 O R D E R Heard
learned counsel for the parties.
The appellants of Criminal Appeal
No.322 of 2007, along with accused Pawan Kumar, Ashok, Chanderpati and Krishna
@ Babbu were convicted by the Trial Court under Section 304B of the Indian
Penal Code [for short, `I.P.C.'] and each one of them was sentenced to undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years. They were further convicted
under Section 498A and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period
of two years and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each; in default, to undergo further
imprisonment for a period of six months. All the accused persons, except
accused-Pawan Kumar, were also convicted under Section 302/34 I.P.C. and
sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-; in
default, to undergo imprisonment for a period of six months. All the sentences,
however, were ordered to run concurrently.
....2/- -2- On appeal being
preferred, the High Court acquitted accsued Ashok, Chanderpati and Krishna @
Babbu, whereas upheld the conviction of the other three accused persons. So far
as accused-Pawan Kumar is concerned, it appears that he did not move this
Court. Criminal Appeal No.322 of 2007 has been filed by accused-Juglal and
Nathiya. The State, however, has filed an appeal bearing Criminal Appeal No.539
of 2007 against the order of acquittal of the High Court in relation to the
aforesaid three accused persons.
The conviction of the accused
persons is based upon the dying declaration of Ompati, Exhibit PF, which has
been recorded by Ms. Roopam, Judicial Magistrate, P.W.4 in the presence of Dr.
Ved Pal, P.W.5, who has given a certificate that the victim was in a fit state
of mind. We have been taken through the dying declaration, Exhibit PF, as well
as the evidence of P.Ws 4 and 5. We do not find any ground to discard the
evidence. In our view, the High Court was quite justified in upholding the
conviction of the appellants in Criminal Appeal No.322 of 2007 and no ground
for interference by this Court is made out. So far as Criminal Appeal No.539 of
2007 filed on behalf of the State of Haryana is concerned, in our view the order of acquittal recorded
by the High Court in relation to accused-Ashok, Chanderpati and Krishna @ Babbu cannot be
said to be perverse in any manner; as such, no interference in that appeal is
Accordingly, the criminal appeals
fail and the same are dismissed.
[G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, May 08, 2008.