Worldcom Multimedia & Ors Vs. Arvind Kumar  INSC 396 (7 March 2008)
CJI K. G. Balakrishnan & R. V. Raveendran O R D E R TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) No. 91 OF 2006 Heard learned counsel for
2. Though the respondent was served with notice, he has not chosen to
3. The petitioners seek transfer of the complaint filed by the respondent
before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kadamkuan, Patna, Bihar. The petitioners'
Company is having its registered office at New Delhi. The complainant alleges
to be a representative and agent of M/s CFL Capital Financial Services Ltd.,
having its registered office at Kolkata. Admittedly, the petitioners had
nothing to do with the complainant (Respondent herein) in his personal
capacity. Neither the complainants nor the company on whose behalf the
respondent allegedly filed the complaint have their place of business at Patna,
nor did any transaction take place at Patna.
4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Complaint
Case No.409 (C) of 2005, titled as Arvind Kumar vs. Worldcom Multimedia &
Ors, pending before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, Bihar shall
stands transferred to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, New Delhi.
5. The Transfer Petition is allowed accordingly.