Rajni Sindhwani Vs.
Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.  INSC 436 (12 March 2008)
Tarun Chatterjee & Harjit
O R D E R (Arising out of SLP) No. 9087 of 2006) Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against the final order dated 9th of January, 2006
passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in Letters Patent
Appeal No.855 of 2004 by which the LPA was allowed and the writ petition
allowed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court was rejected. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the
materials on record, we are of the view that when the writ petition was
entertained and allowed by the learned Single Judge, it was not proper for the
Division Bench to dismiss the writ petition on the ground of delay and latches
only. In that situation and in the facts of this case, LPA ought to have been
heard by the High Court on merits. In this view of the matter, the order passed by the High Court is set aside
and the matter is remitted back to the Division Bench of the High Court to
decide the LPA on merits after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.
The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above. There shall be no order as