M.M. Agrawal Vs.
Rekha V. Kamble and Ors.  INSC 1192 (21 July 2008)
JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4602 OF 2008 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.8752 of
2007) M.M. Agrawal ... Appellant(s) Versus Rekha V. Kamble & Ors. ...
Respondent(s) ORDER Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The respondents filed
a complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai,
[For short, "State Commission"] for award of compensation by alleging
that their father Narayanrao Kamble died due to negligence of respondent no.1,
Dr. M.M. Agrawal and Dr. Krishna Rao, who died during the pendency of appeal
before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, [for short,
"National Commission"]. The complaint was dismissed by the State
Commission vide order dated 14.7.1999. The appeal preferred by the respondents
remained pending before the National Commission for eight years. By the
impugned order, the National Commission allowed the appeal and remanded the
matter to the State Commission for fresh decision in accordance with law after
giving opportunity to the parties to lead affidavit evidence and expert
...2/- -2- We have
heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully scrutinized the record. In
our opinion, the State Commission did not give adequate opportunity to the
parties to adduce oral and documentary evidence and, therefore, the National
Commission was justified in remitting the matter.
In view of the above,
we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly the
appeal is dismissed.
As the complaint was
filed 12 years ago, we direct the State Commission to dispose of the same
within the period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of copy of
the this order. Both the parties shall cooperate with the State Commission in
disposing of the complaint within the aforesaid time. They are directed to
appear before the State Commission on 18.8.2008. Thereafter, the State
Commission shall fix the date for adducing evidence by the parties.
SINGHVI] New Delhi, July 21, 2008.