AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Supreme Court Judgments


Latest Supreme Court of India Judgments 2018

Subscribe

RSS Feed img






Ayodhya Faizabad Development Authority Vs. Brij Raj Maurya [2008] Insc 204 (19 February 2008)

Tarun Chatterjee & Harjit Singh Bedi

O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NO.1478 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9748 of 2007) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1479 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9749 of 2007) CIVIL APPEAL NO.1480 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9751 of 2007) CIVIL APPEAL NO.1481 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9752 of 2007) CIVIL APPEAL NO.1482 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9754 of 2007) CIVIL APPEAL NO.1483 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9755 of 2007) CIVIL APPEAL NO.1484 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9757 of 2007) CIVIL APPEAL NO.1485 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9759 of 2007) CIVIL APPEAL NO.1486 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.9761 of 2007)

Leave granted.

We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow by which the award passed by the Labour Court was affirmed with 25% of back wages. Considering the facts and circumstances of these cases, we are of the view that 25% of back wages shall not be allowed to be paid to the respondent. We order accordingly. With this modification, the order of the High Court is affirmed. The appeals are accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

 

 Back


 



Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered by nubia  |  driven by neosys