State, Rep. by
Inspector of Police, T.N. Vs. Subair @ Mohamed Subair & Ors.  INSC
2233 (18 December 2008)
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 162 OF 2002 The
State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary to Government ...Appellant Versus Subair
@ Mohamed Subair and Ors. ...Respondents
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT,
in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court
directing acquittal of the respondents. Originally five persons faced trial.
The trial Court held the respondents guilty of offence punishable under Section
302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). It however held that
the charge levelled against all the five accused persons under Section 120-B,
IPC was not established. It also held that the charge against 5th accused under
Section 302 read with Section 120B, IPC was not established. The four accused
persons preferred appeal before the High court which by the impugned judgment
directed their acquittal.
version in a nutshell is as follows:
(hereinafter referred to as `deceased') and his friend Ganesh (PW-1) @
Ganeshamoorthy and M. Ganesh (PW-2) were having involvement in Hindu Munnani
said to be a branch of R.S.S. The three were friends. On 26.8.1989,
Ganeshamoorthy (PW-1), M. Ganesh (PW-2) met Veeraganesh at Rangakonar Street in
Kattoor and spoke to him for about ten minutes. Babu (PW-4) the brother of
Veeraganesh was also present at the spot when PW-1 and PW-2 spoke to
Veeraganesh at the said place. After a brief discussion among themselves for a
while, Veeraganesh went to Ganapathy along with PW-1 and PW-2 to meet his
friend. As his friend was not available at Ganapathy, they returned back to RSS
office in Ram Nagar and the three discussed among themselves for about ten
minutes. Then all the three came to the over-bridge via Kattoor. At about 7:30
in the night, the three were going from the round about of the over- bridge
towards the Post office road. On hearing somebody asking them to stop, they
looked back. At that time, A-I to A-4 who were armed with weapons came towards
Veeraganesh and PW-I and PW-2. A-1, A-2 and A-3 were armed with knives and A-4
armed with Aruval (sickle). On approaching towards Veeraganesh, they asked him
to stop, and stated that he was caught now and can not escape and was lost once
for all. Saying so, A-I stabbed Veeraganesh on his abdomen and chest. A-2 who
was armed with a knife stabbed Veeraganesh on the left side of his head, left
shoulder, left thigh and on his leg. A-3 armed with knife assaulted Veeraganesh
on the back of his chest and on the side of his chest. A-4 armed with aruval
assaulted Veeraganesh on his head and face. PW-I and PW-2 pleaded to leave him.
The injured Veeraganesh bled profusely and fell into a pool of blood. A sodium
vapour light was glowing at the place of occurrence at the said over-bridge.
PW-19, the line man of Electricity Board, Coimbatore Corporation stated that on
the day of occurrence he switched on the lights in the over bridge area at 6 PM
in the evening and switched them off at 6 AM on the next morning. PW-1 and PW-2
who pleaded to the accused to leave Veeraganesh fled when they were threatened
by the accused rushing towards them with weapons saying that they would also be
done away with.
When they returned to
the place after some time, they noticed large quantity of blood. They learnt
from the conversation of two or three persons at the spot that the injured had
been removed to Hospital. The weapon of offence used by A-4 at the time of
occurrence is MO-1. The knives used by A-1 to A-3 as weapons of offence are
MOs:2 to 4.
PW-3 Selvaraj drove
the Auto TAR-6474 from Railway function, Coimbatore to flower market via the
over bridge. At that time a person was lying with bleeding wounds at the round
about of the over bridge. He asked PW-3 to take him to Hospital. PW-3
accordingly took him to Hospital and admitted him.
At about 8.15 PM, the
deceased was brought to Emergency Ward by Selvaraj (PW-3), the Auto driver. Dr.
Radhakrishnan (PW-13) was on duty at that time in emergency ward. At that time,
the said Veeraganesh told PW- 13 that on that night, at about 7.30 p.m., at the
over-bridge near the Head Post office, Coimbatore, 4 known persons whose
identity was well known to him, assaulted him with knives and aruvals. When
PW-13 examined Veeraganesh, he noticed various injuries on his body. PW-13 gave
Tetanus injection to Veeraganesh who had sustained the injuries and admitted
him as inpatient in the Trauma ward. PW-13 gave his opinion in which he had
stated that the injuries caused to Veeraganesh could have been caused by the
weapons which are MO-1 and MO-2 to 4 and has also issued a copy of 4 the
Accident Register in this regard marked exhibit P-3. He sent the information
furnished in exhibit P-14 to the out-post Police station located in the
premises of the Hospital.
While PW-20 Vivekanandan
was on duty at the Out Post Police Station of Coimbatore Medical College
Hospital on 26.08.1989, received the copy of the intimation regarding the
admission of Veeraganesh with stab injuries and at 7.45 PM, he informed
Coimbatore B-I Bazaar Police station over telephone. Subsequently, the
information was entered in the OP Police Station records, and the Head
Constable subsequently came and received the intimation.
At about 8.15 PM
while Raja Shanmugam (PW-22), the Head Constable was on duty in Coimbatore B-1
Bazaar Police Station, on the information given by PW-20, he visited the OP
Police Station of the Hospital and received the intimation. He visited the
Trauma ward and recorded the statement of the said Veeraganesh and read over
the same to him and on his acceptance that it was recorded correct, he got his
signature in the statement. The said statement is exhibit P-21. Veeraganesh was
in a condition to give the statement at that time. Dr. Jayaprakash (PW-25) who
was present with PW-22 at that time gave a certificate to the effect that
Veeraganesh was conscious and well oriented at the time of giving the above
said statement. The said certificate (Exhibit P-30) is incorporated in Exhibit
P-21. PW-22 returned to Police Station at 9.30 PM and registered the case in
Cr.No.1027/1989 u/s 307 IPC and sent the FIR along with the complaint to the
Chief Judicial Magistrate. He sent the copies of the FIR to the concerned
Superior officers. The FIR prepared by him is PW-22.
was the inspector of Police of B-1 Bazaar PS. He came to the Police station at
21.30 hrs before setting out on night rounds. He came to know of the
registration of this case by PW-22. As law and order problem existed at that
time within the area under his control, he had to be present in that area in
his station limits in view of the same.
While leaving the
Police Station, he gave instructions to bring the FIR to the SOC and
accordingly after attending the law and order situation in his limits, he came
to the spot of occurrence in the night at 10.30 PM. The place of occurrence was
on the over bridge at Avinashi Road, Head Post office road junction. He
observed the scene of occurrence in the presence of PW-5 Krishnan and Anand and
prepared the observation mahazar Exhibit P-1. The sketch of the scene is
Exhibit P-31. PW-27 seized blood stained earth from the spot of occurrence, the
control earth from the spot of occurrence (unstained tar portion of the road),
the torn four yard dhoti, currency notes, Hawai chappal and other materials
(MOs 5 to 15 mentioned therein) under the cover of mahazar, in the presence of
witnesses. After making arrangements to bring a photographer to the spot of
occurrence, he visited the Hospital, examined and recorded the statement of
Veeraganesh, seized the blood stained shirt, brief worn at the time by
Veeraganesh, Exhibit P-16, Exhibit P-17 in the presence of PW-5 and in the
presence of Anand under the cover of mahazar. As instructed by PW-27, Johan
(PW-26), the photographer, visited the spot of occurrence on 26.08.1989 at 12
p.m and took photographs, which are MOs 19 to 26.
The negatives of the
said photographs are MOs 27 to 34.
Smt.S. Kalavathi who
was the Judicial Magistrate on 26.08.1989 received the requisition for
recording the dying declaration (PW-11) at 10 PM, visited the Trauma ward in
the Hospital and after knowing the details regarding the concerned person, she
examined him. After confirming that he was conscious and well oriented, she
recorded his statement. She took the left thumb impression of the injured
person on the dying declaration. The said statement is Exhibit P-12. Doctor
Balasubramaniam (PW-12), gave a certificate to the effect that the injured was
conscious at the time of giving the dying declaration.
On 29.08.89, as per the
information received by him, PW-27 arrested the accused A-1 Zubair, A-2
Mohammed Khan, A-3 Rafi at 12.00 a.m. at Podanur-Pollachi Road Junction at
Aathupalam. When he enquired them separately, they gave separate statements,
which were recorded. On the basis of these statements recoveries were made.
On 29.08.1989 at 7.30
P.M. while Dr. Govindaraj (PW-18) was on duty in emergency ward, the accused
Mohammed Zubair along with the medical memo given by the inspector of Police,
B-I Bazaar Police station, came for treatment. He was having following injuries
on his person:
1. A skin deep cut
injury on his left index finger, it was of 2 cuts length on the outer aspect of
the finger. It was in a half healed state.
2. A small cut injury
on his left thumb.
3. A contusion
beneath his left ear.
He was treated as out
patient. In this regard a copy of the exhibit P-19 was issued. On the same day
PW-18 examined A-3 Rafi and found the following injuries on his person:- 1. A
small cut injury on his right index finger.
2. A cut injury of
about 1cm length sking deep on his left thumb.
He was also treated
as out patient and a copy of the AR register, Exhibit P- 20 was issued.
(PW-14) gave treatment to Veeraganesh on 27.08.89. He treated him to stabilise
his general condition and blood pressure to prepare him for the surgical
operation. He performed the surgery on him at 10:45 PM.
Dr. Baskaran (PW-16)
examined Veeraganesh on the night of 31.08.89 at 9.30 PM and found his
condition critical. Despite the intensive treatment given Veeraganesh died at
11.25 PM on that night. In this regard he sent an intimation Exhibit P-15.
PW-27, the Inspector of Police who received the intimation altered the section
of law and submitted the express report, altering the section into 302 IPC,
Exhibit P-32, to the Judicial Magistrate. Subsequently, he held inquest on the
dead body of Veeraganesh in the presence of witnesses at the Hospital and
prepared the inquest report, Exhibit P-33. He sent the requisition for post
mortem examination of the dead body, Exhibit P-17 through PW-21, the Police
constable John Viswanathan. On receipt of the requisition PW-17 Dr. Diwakaran,
the Additional Professor of Coimbatore Medical College Hospital, commenced the
post mortem examination at 8 AM on 01.09.89. During post mortem examination he
noticed abrasions with reddish brown scab, over the right fore arm, over the
back of the left shoulder, over the outer aspect of the left arm, over the
front of right knee and above the right big toe. Apart from them, he noticed
incised sutured wounds of muscle deep over the center of the forehead, over the
root of the nose, over the bridge of the nose, below the lower lips, over the
right side of the chin, over the right cheek, over the lower portion of the right
ear, over the right side of the angle of the jaw, over the right side of the
outer aspect of the neck, behind the right ear on the scalp, over the
parieto-occipital area, over the mid-occipital area, over the root of the neck
and left side of the front chest, over the right side aspect of the chest, over
the right side outer aspect of the chest. These injuries were mentioned from 6
to 22. He also gave the measurements of the wounds.
Further, he mentioned
the surgical wounds from 23 to 44. He also gave the locations of the wounds and
their measurements. He gave post mortem certificate with his opinion, Exhibit
P-28 stating that the deceased would have died of septic complication of stab
injuries over the abdomen. He further stated that the injuries 41 to 44 were
sufficient to cause the death of an ordinary man. These injuries 41 to 44 were
found on the small intestines.
PW-27 submitted a
requisition, Exhibit P-23 sending the properties seized in this case for
chemical analysis. Rajamani (PW-23), the Head Clerk deposed about the details
regarding the details of the forwarding note sent to the Forensic science
Laboratory, Exhibit P-24 and regarding the reports received from the said lab,
Exhibit P-25 and Exhibit P-26.
Some of the witnesses
spoke regarding the motive for the murder of Veeraganesh and the criminal
conspiracy hatched by the accused to murder him. Durai (PW-7) stated to have
witnessed all the accused on the night of 13.7.1989 at Oppanakara Street and
also witnessed A-5 having a notice in his hand and accused Hyder Ali having a
tin box with glue in his hand. PW- 7 also witnessed them pasting the notice on
a petty shop located opposite to a bank. The notice contained the wordings,
"Islamic Fatwa. We would murder the RSS Mookambigai Mani, Sampath,
Paramasivam who incite religious ill-feelings, within a week" which also
contained the word "jihad"
in it. PW-7 also spoke
about having witnessed the four accused coming out of a mosque discussing among
themselves and later, going to the shop of one Bilal Hajiyar and continuing the
discussion in his shop about four days prior to the occurrence. In the
deposition given by Devan (PW-8), has spoken about having witnessed the accused
two or three times, at Bilal Hardwares shop and discussing among themselves and
also about having witnessed the accused A-5 threatening Veeraganesh at Race
course, in front of cosmopolitan club, saying that "my anger would subside
only if you are murdered", Prior to a week before the occurrence. PW-8
further spoke about having witnessed the four, five accused secretly discussing
among themselves in front of big mosque and their subsequent going in to the
Bilal Hardware shop.
In the evidence given
by Sankar (PW-10), has stated that in about the first week of August 1989, on a
particular day, when he was going with Veeraganesh near the over-bridge, the
said five accused stared at him and A-5 told Veeraganesh, "we are waiting
for you only, wait" and further stated that, when PW-10 hurriedly took
Veeraganesh in an Auto and fled the scene, A-5 told Veeraganesh, "you
escaped today, how many days will you have some one with you".
12 Sekar (PW-24),
the Inspector of Police has given evidence with regard to the cases registered
against Veeraganesh and the accused. PW-24 has deposed about the Coimbatore B-1
Bazaar PS Cr. No.440/1998 u/s 141, 302, 149 IPC registered against Veeraganesh
and 22 others, B-1 Bazaar PS Cr.No.420/1998 u/s 141, 148, 341, 302 r/w 149 IPC
registered against Ramnarayan, Veeraganesh, Mookambikai Mani, Paramasivam and
Sampath; B-1 Bazaar PS Cr.No.3Z55/1998 registered against Basha and 10 others
belonging to Muslim community. The accused were muslim fundamentalists and the
deceased Veeraganesh and others belonged to the organisation Hindu Munnani and
that a number of cases were registered against them. Saraswathy (PW-9) is the
mother of Veeraganesh. She had spoken that her son was the District organiser
in Hindu Munnani and that he used to speak in the Public Platforms and that the
muslims had an animosity against him as a result of his speeches made in the
the Inspector of Police, CB-CID, took examination in this case on 2.9.1989.
After examination of witnesses as per the information received by him, he
arrested the accused Hyder Ali at Ambrampalayam on 7.9.1989 at 6 AM and
subsequently sent him to Judicial custody.
13 Mukkambu (PW-29),
the Inspector of Police, CB-CID., arrested A-5 at Bilal Hardware in N.H, Road,
Coimbatore on 23.09.1989. As per the statements of witnesses Devan, Durai and
Sankar, he arrested A-5 and remanded him. He completed the investigation in
this case and on 20.8.1990 he submitted the charge sheet against the accused
u/s 120(B), 302 and 120 (B) read with Section 302 IPC against the accused.
After taking the
evidences of the prosecution witnesses, as per the Section 313 of Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the `Code') the accused were questioned with
regard to the evidence led against them by the prosecution. A-1 stated that it
was a false case foisted against him and that was not concerned in that case.
A-2 submitted that the case was a false case and that he was the first younger
brother of Basha. A-3 stated that the case registered against him was a false
case and his father's name was Hanifa and that Shajahan was not his father's
name. A-4 stated that he was not at all concerned in the case. A-5 stated that
it was a false case intentionally foisted against them. No defence witness was
examined on behalf of the accused.
14 On the basis of
complaint filed, first information report was lodged and investigation was
undertaken. On completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed. Since the
accused persons pleaded innocence, trial was held. Twenty nine witnesses were
examined to further the prosecution version. The trial Court found the accused
guilty. In appeal, the High Court found the evidence of PWs 1 and 2 as well as
the so called dying declaration to be not credible and cogent and directed
3. It was submitted
that the reasons given by the High Court to direct acquittal are without any
basis. There is no appearance for the respondents.
4. It is seen that
PWs 1 and 2 stated that they had left the injured in lurch and had disappeared
from the scene making deceased to cringe an auto driver to take him to
hospital. Would any close friend of a person involved in the movement allow
such a thing to happen to him is the question looming large and there is no
explanation for it. Further, it is curious to note that both PWs 1 and 2 have
stated that they did not inform about the occurrence to anybody till they were
asked by the police in the mid night of the date of occurrence. The conduct of
PWs 1 and 2 is un-natural and unbelievable and their presence at the time of
occurrence is doubtful and the testimonies of PWs 1 and 2 cannot be accepted.
5. Veera Ganesan did
not state in his dying declaration before the Judicial Magistrate that accused
Nos. 1 to 4 were his assailants in the occurrence. Ex.P-12 is the dying
declaration of deceased recorded by, Judicial Magistrate Kalavathi (PW-11) at
Coimbatore Medical College Hospital. According to dying declaration of deceased
from the hospital at 10.00 p.m. on 26.8.1989 she went and saw deceased in the
Trauma Ward and she put some questions to him and was satisfied that the
injured was in a fit condition and she recorded Ex.P-12 statement given by
deceased in the presence of PW-12 and she obtained the left hand thumb
impression of him in it. PW-12 has also given a certificate in Ex.P-12 that the
patient was fully conscious and was able to speak throughout the recording of
From the above, it is
clear that the Judicial Magistrate after observing formalities had recorded the
dying declaration of deceased in the presence of duty doctor. In that Ex.P-12
dying declaration. Deceased had stated as follows:
four persons chased and stabbed me near the fly-over. Their names are not
known. One month before, they exhibited posters that we would all be killed. It
is not known who are they."
emphasis) Deceased in the above statement has stated that four persons attackd
him and he did not know their names. According to the prosecution case,
deceased knew all the accused very well since he had an encounter with all of
them a few days before the occurrence as is evident from the testimony of
PW-10. In such circumstance, if really accused Nos. 1 to 4 had attacked
deceased, definitely he would have told the names or identification of the
assailants. The prosecution relied on Ex.P-21 statement given by deceased to
PW-22 Head Constable in the Coimbatore Medical College Hospital as his dying
declaration. According to PW-22 Head Constable, he received intimation about
the admission of deceased in Government Hospital at 8.15 p.m. and he went to
Trauma Ward in the hospital and enquiry deceased at 9.30 p.m. and recorded
Ex.P-21 statement given by him and Dr. Jayaprakash (PW-25) had given a
certificate in it. PW-25 was not the doctor on duty in Trauma ward at the time
of recording Ex.P-21 statement and he himself in the cross examination has
stated that usually the doctor incharge of the ward alone would certify in the
dying declaration. Ex.P-21 statement of deceased runs to two full pages and the
names of the accused and the overt acts on their part were mentioned in detail
and the signature of deceased is also found in it. Ex.P-21 was recorded at 9.30
p.m. by the Head constable and Ex.P-12 was recorded at 10.15 p.m. by the
Judicial Magistrate. There is vast difference in both the statements with
regard to the contents and it is pertinent to note that Ex.P-22 first
information report based on Ex.P-21 complaint was received in the court at 6.40
a.m. on 27.8.1989 and Ex.P-21 statement as such had reached the court only on
28.8.1989. The actual complaint was not sent along with the first information
report and it leads to a serious suspicion as noted by the High Court. In the
circumstances, the dying declaration recorded by Judicial Magistrate (PW-11)
deserves acceptance and in it deceased did not implicate accused Nos. 1 to 4 as
7. The High Court
highlighted the above said aspects to direct acquittal.
We find that the
analysis made by the High Court to direct acquittal cannot be faulted. The
appeal is without merit and dismissed accordingly.
(Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT)