State of M.P. Vs.
Munnibai & ANR.  INSC 1453 (28 August 2008)
(Criminal Appeal No.
1298 of 2002) AUGUST 28, 2008 [Dr. Arjit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam and Aftab Alam,
JJ] The Order of the Court was delivered by Dr.ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Heard learned
counsel for the parties.
Challenge in this
appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court
directing acquittal of the respondents Munni Bai and Gendalal. The accused
persons faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section
302 and Section 328 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in
short `IPC'). The accused persons were found guilty and sentenced to undergo
imprisonment for life and five years by learned Additional Sessions Judge,
version as unfolded during trial is as follows:- Munni Bai (PW.3) is a
professional dancer and prior to the date of incident, she used to reside with
the Tirath Singh (hereinafter referred to as `deceased') as his keep. Accused
Gendalal and accused Mulayam Singh (since absconding) wanted that Munni Bai
should live with them as keep, but she was not willing. While Munni Bai was
staying with deceased Tirath Singh accused Gendalal and accused Mulayam Singh
came to the village and invited them for dance function in the village. On
their invitation, the deceased and Munni Bai came to village Sirsiri, where
they were kept at the residence of one Shankar Barua. There they ate Roti and
brought by Gendalal
and accused Mulayam Singh spent the night in the house of Shankar Barua. In the
morning, (Munni Bai) PW3.
intended going to
village Oriya but was stopped by accused Mulayam Singh and he stated that dance
and song programme shall be held. Around noon time accused Mulayam Singh took
her and deceased Tirath Singh for taking food at the residence of Gendalal.
Munni Bai and deceased Tirath took food at the residence of Gendalal and slept
there. When they woke up in the evening, deceased and accused persons smoked `Ganja'
and took `Thandai'. Thereafter, accused Mulayam Singh and Gendalal Singh
brought two plates containing food articles including `Halua'. While P.W.3
Munni Bai ate Halua, she found the taste to be pungent and thereafter she did
not further eat the Halua. After taking the food, deceased Tirath Singh and
Munni Bai became unconscious and thereafter they were taken by Gendalal and
accused Mulayam Singh to the residence of Shankar Barua and thereafter to the
house of (Bhagwat Singh) P.W.13 From there, the deceased was taken to village
Oriya Ghat in a bullock cart . While he was being taken to Udaipur hospital by
his brother (Khet Singh) PW.12 , he died and the dead body was taken to the
Udaipur Police Station. Information was recorded at the village and the same
was forwarded to Saikheda Police Station on the basis of which offence under
Sections 328 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code was registered.
During the course of
investigation, dead body of Tirath Singh was sent for post-mortem examination
which was conducted by Dr. Narendra Kumar Palod (PW.19). According to the post
mortem report, death of Tirath Singh had occurred because of respiratory and
circulatory failure and may be because of poison. The viscera of deceased was
sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory, Sagar for chemical examination.
The same was found to contain zink phosphide. Police after investigation
submitted charge-sheet against the appellants and Mulayam Singh (since
absconding) for offence under Sections 328 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Appellants denied to have committed any offence and their plea is that they
have been falsely implicated in the case.
As the appellant
denied to have committed any offence and took the plea of false implication,
trial was held. In order to further its case, the prosecution examined nine
witnesses. Munnibai (PW3) was stated to be the star witness. Her witness was to
the effect that the food was served to the deceased and to her by the accused
persons and one Mulayam Singh who had absconded. The Trial court found the
evidence of PW3 to be reliable and directed conviction and imposed sentences as
afore-noted. The accused persons preferred appeal before the High Court. The
primary reason for the High Court directing acquittal was that it was inconceivable
that accused Munni bai would be a party to a plan that her husband would keep
Munni Bai (PW3) as his keep. It was also found rather improbable that
absconding accused Mulayam Singh and Gendalal would have a common motive to
keep Munni Bai (PW3) with them when one of them was married to accused
Munnibai. So far as the question of administering poison is concerned, the High
Court found that there was no evidence to show that any of the accused persons
administered poison. The evidence of Munni Bai (PW3) was to the effect that the
poison was mixed with the Halua and she found the taste to be pungent and did
not have the whole of halua served to her; but the deceased took the whole
quantity which was offered to him. The High Court noted that she did not know from
where the Halua came.
was no forensic examination of the halua which is supposed to have contained
the poison by PW3 and shared by the deceased.
In that view of the
matter, we are not inclined to interfere with the judgment of the acquittal
impugned in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed.