Kirtilal Mehta & Ors. Vs. Vijay Kirtilal Mehta & Ors.  INSC 637 (11 April
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRL.MP.NO. 6442 OF 2008 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2008 KISHOR KIRTILAL MEHTA & ORS. Appellant (s)
VERSUS VIJAY KIRTILAL MEHTA & ORS. Respondent(s) ORDER This application has
been filed on behalf of the respondent No.1 for correction of certain
typographical errors in the judgment delivered in the appeal on 18/02/2008.
The details of the errors have been set out in the application. Learned
counsel appearing for the appellants submits that he has gone through the
application and he has no objection to such errors being corrected.
In that view of the matter, the application is allowed. Let the corrections
be carried out in the manner indicated in the application.
Over and above the said errors, it seems there are some other mistakes which
have also come to notice after this application was filed, namely, -2- i)
Paragraph 15 has been mentioned twice at pages 10&12 of the judgment. Let
the paragraph at page 12 be renumbered as 15A.
ii) At page 33 of the judgement at paragraph 39 the name of the learned
senior counsel for the State has been wrongly shown as Mr. P.B. Sawant when it
should be Mr. C.J. Sawant.
Let the said two errors be also corrected. Let a certified copy of the
corrected copy of the judgement be given to the parties.
The corrections made in terms of this application should not stand in the
way of the application of the appellants being heard by the Bombay High Court with
regard to the examination of the documents in question, which we are told is
fixed for hearing on 16th April, 2008.
(ALTAMAS KABIR) ....................J.
(MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA) NEW DELHI;
April 11, 2008.