Singh Vs. State of Haryana and
others  INSC 607 (9 April 2008)
TARUN CHATTERJEE & HARJIT SINGH BEDI
O R D E R Non-Reportable Civil Appeal No 2699 of 2008 [Arising out of
Special Leave Petition (c) 6347 of 2007] With Civil Appeal No 2700 of 2008
[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) 6427 of 2007] Mohinder Kaur (D) by
LRs. & Ors.
Appellants State of Haryana & Ors. Respondents With Civil Appeal No2701
of 2008 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (c) 6348 of 2007] Nasib Singh
& Ors. Appellants State of Haryana and Ors. Respondents 1. Leave granted.
2. In spite of due service and opportunity to contest the appeal, no one has
entered appearance in the appeal or contested the appeal at the time of
3. These appeals, by way of Special Leave, are filed against a final
Judgment and order dated 26th of July 2006 passed in Regular First Appeal Nos.
22, 185 and 217 of 1989 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh,
by which the First Appeals, filed at the instance of the appellant, were
dismissed which were filed for enhancement of compensation for the land
acquired by the respondents.
4. Without going into the facts in detail, these appeals can be disposed of
on a very short point. It is an admitted position that an application under
Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure (In short "CODE") for
acceptance of additional evidence was filed before the High Court in the
aforesaid First Appeals, which were dismissed by the High Court by the impugned
order. However, the application for acceptance of additional evidence under
Order 41 Rule 27 of the CODE was not considered by the High Court while
disposing of the appeal.
5. That being the position, without going into the legality and propriety of
the impugned order of the High Court passed in the aforesaid appeals, we set
aside the same and remit back the cases to the High Court for decision of the
Appeals afresh on merits and in accordance with law along with the application
for acceptance of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CODE.
6. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside. The High Court is requested
to dispose of the First Appeals in the light of the observations and directions
made hereinabove within three months from the date of supply of a copy of this
Order along with application for acceptance of additional evidence under Order
41 Rule 27 of the CODE.
7. It is expected that the parties shall not be entitled to ask for
adjournments on unsatisfactory grounds.
8. For the reasons aforesaid, the appeals are allowed to the extent
indicated above. There will be no order as to costs.