Vs. K.R. Mahesh  Insc 390 (11 July 2006)
Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia Arijit Pasayat, J.
are made in heaven, is an adage. A bride leaves the parental home for the
matrimonial home, leaving behind sweet memories there with a hope that she will
see a new world full of love in her groom's house. She leaves behind not only
her memories, but also her surname, gotra and maidenhood. She expects not only
to be a daughter-in-law, but a daughter in fact. But the large number of cases
flooding the courts with allegations of torture, harassment for dowry, saddens
one's heart. Where lies the fault? Is it lack of communication or adjustment?
Or, is it the victory of greed and materialistic needs over love, affection and
human values? The answer is difficult to find. There is another angle involved.
evil design to harass the in-laws over petty things by making accusations of
dowry demand and torture. In such cases, the vital question again is whether
laws which are really dynamic instruments fashioned by society for the purpose
of achieving human relations by elimination of social tensions and conflicts
have achieved the intended objectives or are being used as weapons of an
assassin to harass and humiliate others instead of being used as a shield
is another social angle involved. When the parents fight out their marital
disputes, sometimes acrimoniously, the child who have nothing to do with the
fight and is the ultimate victim watches helplessly. The fight goes on unmindful
of the fact that in future the child carries the tag of being one of a broken
family. It is more stigmatic for a girl child. The stigma becomes more visible
when her marriage is thought of in later years. This reality of life is, in
most cases, lost sight of. But sometimes the parties take note of this reality
and for the sake of the child iron out their differences.
the hearing of the transfer petition a suggestion was given by learned counsel
for the parties that the marriage has become irretrievably broken and keeping
in view the welfare of their daughter it would be better if the petition for
divorce filed by the respondent is allowed, after making sufficient arrangement
for the welfare of the daughter.
petitioner and the respondent entered into wedlock on 28.11.1994 and the
daughter was born on 30.12.1995.
it appears that cracks stared appearing in the marital relations and a series
of litigation has resulted. In fact, on the basis of a prayer for maintenance,
the Family Court at Mumbai has granted maintenance at the rate of Rs.1500/- per
month. The respondent has filed a petition for divorce on various grounds.
Attempts have been made by learned counsel for the parties to see whether the
differences can be ironed out. But the result appears to have been negative.
Thereafter the suggestion as noted above has been given. The respondent has
stated that he is willing to pay a sum of rupees seven lakhs so that by part of
it the education of the daughter who is presently staying with the petitioner
can be taken care of and balance money can be spent to meet the marriage
expenses when she reaches the marriageable age. On the contrary the petitioner
has stated that the amount offered by the respondent is low. It has been stated
that the respondent may deposit Rs.8.5 lakhs in the name of the daughter which
can be invested in the Kisan Vikas Patras to ensure that after 12 years the
said amount becomes roughly about rupees 20 lakhs. In addition, the respondent
should pay such amount which by investment can fetch interest of about Rs.3,500/-
per month for the daughter's education presently, and Rs.6,000/- per month for
higher education. It is submitted Kisan Vikas Patras carries interest @ 8.4%
while the bank fixed deposit rate is around 6.5%.
pointed out that investment in M/s Aviva Insurance Company by paying annual
premium of Rs.30,000/- for a period of 12 years will fetch assured sum on
maturity Rs.8,70,000/- with a three years lock in period. It is submitted on
deposit of Rs.3.60 lakhs in bank account of ABN Amro Bank in a unit linked
policy of AVIVA called "Save Guard Policy" shall bring in Rs.5,08,182/-
for a deposit of 10 years.
find that acceptedly the marriage has irretrievably broken down and there would
be no point in making an effort to bring about a conciliation between the
parties. However, the welfare of the daughter is of paramount importance and
the parties appear to have re-conciled to this position.
have considered the suggestion given by the parties.
direct as follows:-
A sum of rupees
five lakhs shall be kept in fixed deposit in a nationalized bank initially for
a period of 5 years with monthly interest withdrawal to meet the educational
expenses of the child.
A sum of
Rs.3,60,000/- will be deposited in the name of the child Anugraha Mahesh
represented by the mother guardian Manjula, the petitioner, in a bank account
with ABN Amro Bank in a Unit Linked Policy of AVIVA for a period of 12 years.
As noted above, it has been indicated in the documents filed by the respondent
that after a period of 12 years the assured sum upon maturity would be Rs.8,70,000/-
with a three year lock in period.
respondent shall file an undertaking before the concerned Trial Court that in
case there is a shortfall in the assured sum, the respondent shall pay the
balance amount to the petitioner. The deposit shall be made within a period of
deposit being made in the indicated manner the suit for divorce filed by the
respondent in the Family Court, Chennai (OP No. 1857 of 2005) shall be treated
to be a joint petition for divorce, on the basis of mutual consent and
appropriate decree shall be passed. The allegations made in the petition for
divorce shall be treated to be inconsequential in view of the fact that divorce
shall be granted on mutual consent.
transfer petition is accordingly disposed of.