of Haryana Vs. Satish Kumar  Insc 129 (23 February 2005)
Singh & Arun Kumar
office report) WITH CRL.APPEAL NO. 1236 of 1999
(With office report) Date: 23/02/2005
These Appeals were called on for hearing today.
MR. JUSTICE B.P. SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR For Appellant(s) Ms.Avneet
Adv. Mr Vinay Kumar Garg,Adv.
Respondent(s) Dr.Sumant Bharadwaj, Adv. Mr.A.C. Jain, Adv. Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj,Adv.
hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeals are
dismissed in terms of the signed judgment.
Dhingra) (Vijay Dhawan) Court Master Court Master [Signed Non-Reportable
judgment is placed on the file] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE
JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1235 OF 1999 STATE OF HARYANA Appellant (s) VERSUS SATISH KUMAR
Respondent(s) WITH CRL.APPEAL NO.1236/1999
have heard counsel for the appellant State and also perused the order of the
In a case
under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as
'the Act') the High Court after considering the evidence on record found that
the prosecution has not been able to make out a case under Section 16(1)(a)(ii)
read with Section 7 of the Act. It accordingly allowed the appeal and acquitted
have gone through the material on record and heard counsel for the appellant.
find no reason to interfere with the order of acquittal.
appeals are, therefore, dismissed.