of Orissa Vs. Niranjan Mohapatra & Ors  Insc 81 (3 February 2005)
Singh & B.N. Srikrishna B.P.Singh,J.
have heard counsel for the parties.
is an appeal against the judgment and order of the High Court of Orissa, Cuttack in Criminal Appeal Nos.149 and 221
of 1994 dated 24th
September, 1997. The
High Court by its impugned judgment and order allowed both the appeals and
acquitted the respondents of all the charges levelled against them. Earlier,
the appellants had been convicted by the trial court under Sections 498A and
304B IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years under
Section 498A and 7 years under Section 304B IPC. However, the appellants in
Criminal Appeal No.221/1994 who are respondent 3 and 4 before us were released
on probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act. As earlier
noticed, the High Court by its impugned judgment and order has acquitted all of
them of the charges levelled against them.
have heard counsel for the parties and we have also perused the records placed
before us. We find ourselves in agreement with the High Court that so far as
the allegations relating to the offence under Section 498A is concerned, the
prosecution has not been able to establish its case against the respondents.
The High Court has considered the evidence on record and we find no reason to
interfere with the finding of fact recorded by the High Court. So far as the
offence under Section 304B is concerned, there is no evidence to suggest that
soon before the occurrence the deceased was subjected to torture and
harassment. In the absence of any such evidence, conviction under Section 304B
cannot be sustained. Even the medical evidence on record is rather ambiguous.
are, therefore, of the considered opinion that the High Court has recorded the
order of acquittal based on the evidence on record and on proper appreciation
of such evidence.
therefore, find no merit in the appeals and the same are accordingly dismissed.