State of Tamilnadu Vs. S. Sebastin & Ors  Insc
535 (29 October 2003)
Babu & P. Venkatarama Reddi
Appeal (civil) 8508 of 2003 With arising outS.L.P.(C) No.
21676/2001 P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.
granted in S.L.P.(C) No. 21676/2001.
respondents were appointed as Conductors/ Drivers on daily-wage basis in the
then Madras State Transport Department (MSTD). Their services were regularized
one or two years later. When the Pallavan Transport Corporation and Kattabomman
Transport Corporation were formed, they were sent on deputation to the said
Corporations which were bifurcated subsequently and they were permanently
absorbed in the service of the said Corporations after calling for options from
the respondents. By G.O.No. 1028 (Transport) dated 23.9.1985 read with G.O.No.
284 (Finance) dated 31.3.1980, the cutoff date for the purpose of eligibility
to pension in respect of the erstwhile State Transport Department employees was
fixed as 1.5.1975. Later on i.e., by G.O.MS.No. 250 (Transport) dated
18.11.1996 the crucial date was changed to 15.9.1975. If the date 1.5.1975 or
15.9.1975 is to be taken into account, the respondents will become eligible for
pensionary benefit only if their service was counted from the date of initial
appointment, otherwise, they would not be completing ten years of qualifying
service by 15.9.1975. As the appellants took the stand that the daily-wage
service will not count in reckoning the qualifying service as per the Tamilnadu
Pension Rules, the respondents filed writ petitions seeking direction to
calculate their qualifying service in the MSTD from the date of their initial
appointment as daily- wage employees instead of counting it from the date of
their absorption on regular basis in Government service.
Writ appeal No. 545 of 1998 which is the subject matter of S.L.P.(C) No. 21676
of 2001 filed by the respondents herein was allowed and directions were issued
to calculate the writ petitioners' qualifying service from the date of their
initial entry into service and to sanction and release the pensionary benefits
accordingly. Writ appeal No.1411 of 1994 which has given rise to Civil Appeal
No. 494 of 2002 filed by the State of Tamilnadu against the order of the learned single Judge allowing the writ petition
becomes practically unnecessary to go into the question whether the daily-wage
service should also be counted towards qualifying service for the reason that
by a judgment pronounced today in Civil Appeal Nos. 1444- 1445/1999 etc., we
have held, affirming the view of the High Court that the fixation of the cutoff
date as 1.5.1975 or 15.9.1975 is unconstitutional and we directed that the
eligibility to pension should be assessed with reference to the cutoff date
1.4.1982. If that date is taken into account, indisputably, the respondents
will be having sufficient qualifying service to earn pension as per the State
Government rules, even if the daily-wage service is excluded.
appeals are therefore disposed of in terms of directions given in our judgment
pronounced today in Civil Appeal Nos. 1444-1445/1999 etc.