State (NCT) of Delhi  Insc 622 (11 December 2003)
N.Santosh Hegde & B.P.Singh. Santosh Hegde, J.
Special Leave Petition (crl.) 710 of 2003
learned counsel for the parties.
this matter, we had directed the release of the appellant on bail as per order
dated 25th of April, 2003. On 6th of May, 2003, we were informed that the
appellant was not yet released on bail, therefore, on that date, we directed
the matter to be listed the next day and called upon the respondent to explain
the delay in giving effect to the bail order. On 8.5.2003, Sub-Inspector Amal Tyagi
of Gokulpuri Police Station, appeared before the Court and submitted that his
police station has nothing to do with the release of the appellant, as directed
by this Court. Therefore, we directed the matter to be listed on 11th of July,
2003. In the said order, we also directed the Superintendent, Central Jail of Tihar
No.II to be personally present in the Court. On 11.7.2003, we called upon the
said officer to explain the delay in giving effect to the bail order. We also
called upon the Union Territory, namely, State (in City of Delhi) to file its response.
the response filed by the said officers, it is seen that the order made by this
Court on 25th of April, 2003 was received in Central Jail of Tihar No. II only
on 1.5.2003 and immediately on receipt of the same, the appellant was informed
to furnish the required bond with a surety. It is on his furnishing such
surety, the Trial Court, namely, the Additional Sessions Judge issued a release
order on 7.5.2003.
to which the appellant has been released thereafter.
in this case, there has been noticeable delay in the release of the appellant
in spite of the bail granted by this Court, the same is due to the procedure
involved in giving effect to the bail order made by this Court and not due to
any individual's laxity.
place on record our appreciation for the assistance rendered by Shri Vijay Panjwani,
learned Advocate of this Court as Amicus Curiae in the above matter. He shall
be paid a fee of Rs.750/-.
the reasons stated above, this appeal is disposed of.