AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Supreme Court Judgments


Latest Supreme Court of India Judgments 2018

Subscribe

RSS Feed img










State of Maharashtra & ANR Vs. Dr. S.S. Srivastava & ANR [1997] INSC 145 (10 February 1997)

K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI

ACT:

HEAD NOTE:

O R D E R

Leave granted.

We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the respondent-in-person.

This appeal by special leave arises from the order passed by the Tribunal in Contempt Petition No. 35/1996 in pending O.A. No. 1156/94. The Tribunal had issued interim directions that "(I)n the circumstances, we hereby direct the respondents as an interim measure to consider the applicant to the Senior Scale and Junior Administrative Grade according to the Rules within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the order. Accordingly, M.P. 11/96 is disposed of in the light of the above. The Respondents are directed to file their reply to the amended C.A. by 14.3.1996. The matter be kept before the Registrar at Nagpur on 14.3.1996." It is stated by the appellants that they have considered the case on June 7, 1996 and found him not fit to the said Senior Time Scale. Thereafter, the respondent filed contempt petition in the Tribunal and the Tribunal has passed the impugned order relevant part of which is as under:

"...the State Government should also consider the fitness of the applicant for being promoted to the Junior Administrative Grade from an appropriate date strictly as per rules within two months from the date of the communication of this order. We make it clear that we are passing this order as an interim measure and the applicant will be entitled for arrears, though the applicant would be entitled for national fixation of pay on promotion to Senior Time Scale from 1.4.93." Thus, this appeal by special leave.

Though the learned counsel for the appellants as well as respondent-in-person seek to raise contentions on merits, we think that this is not an appropriate stage for us to go into the merits in the matter. In view of the stand taken by the appellants that the case of the respondent was considered by the Government and found that he was not eligible for grant of Senior Time Scale, as directed by the Tribunal, the appropriate course should be that the Tribunal may decide matter on merits and then deal with it according to law. Instead, unfortunately, the Tribunal has exceeded its power in giving the directions, even before the matter was considered on merits. Under these circumstances, the order of the Tribunal stands set aside. The Tribunal is directed to decide the matter on merits and dispose of the main O.A. within a period of two months from the date of the receipt of the order.

The appeal is accordingly allowed.

 Back


 



Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered by nubia  |  driven by neosys