Magainbhai Patel Vs. Collector & Ors  INSC 722 (10 May 1996)
Faizan Uddin, G.B. Pattanaik
O R D
for the petitioner admits that a notification under Section 10  of the Urban
Ceiling Act was published pursuant to which the excess vacant land was
surrendered and taken possession of by the Government. Consequently, the land
stands vested in the State free rom all the encumbrances. In what manner the
lands require to be utilised has been regulated under the provisions of the
not a condition, under the Act, that payment of compensation be made before utilisation
of the land of which the petitioner was erswhile owner. Under these
circumstances, we do not find any illegality in the order passed by the High
Court in Special Civil Appeal No.4093/93 on May 15, 1995.
Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.