Road Transport Corporation. Vs. Shri Dinesh Kumar  INSC 672 (7 May 1996)
K.S.(J) Paripoornan, K.S.(J) Jeevan Reddy, B.P. (J) Paripoornan. J.
1996 SCC (4) 560 JT 1996 (5) 319 1996 SCALE (4)395
APPEAL NO 7846 OF 1996 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 16027 of 1995) Himachal
Road Transport Corporation. V. Ms. Parveen Kumari
Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation is the appellant in both the
appeals. One Shri Dinesh Kumar is the respondent in the appeal filed against
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 15998 of 1995 and one Ms. Parveen Kumari is the
respondent in the appeal filed against Special Leave Petition (C) No. 16027 of
1995. In this judgment the appellant will be referred to as the 'Corporation',
and the respondents will be mentioned by their names.
Corporation has filed the appeals against the order of Himachal Pradesh
Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.423/95 dated 27.3.1995 in the case of Shri Dinesh
Kumar and against the order passed in O.A. No.3320/94 dated 6.3.1995 in the
case of Ms. Parveen Kumari. Both the appeals are connected. They involve
consideration of a common question, namely, whether the respondents are
entitled to be appointed as clerks on regular basis forthwith under the 'kith
and kin policy'. We should hasten to add that the validity of kth and kin
policy was not questioned before us. So, we are not adjudicating the larger
aspect in these appeals.
heard counsel. The minimal facts necessary for the disposal of the appeals are
as follows:- The respondents in both the appeals applied for appointment as
clerks under kith and kin policy in the Corporation. Shri Dinesh Kumar is son
of late Shri Hari Krishan, who was serving as an Accountant in the Corporation.
Shri Hari Krishan died on 14.4.1990, leaving behind him his wife and three
sons. The Corporation has settled and paid all dues to the family by way of
family pension, gratuity, provident fund, leave encashment, etc. In addition
thereto one of the dependants of deceased Shri Hari Krishan, Shri Dinesh Kumar,
the respondent, was provided with a part-time job on Rs. 600/- per month in Bilaspur.
he was offered the post of a conductor on regular basis, but he declined to
accept the same. Since there was no vacancy in the clerical post Shri Dinesh
Kumar was appointed on contract basis as a clerk. He moved the Administrative
Tribunal and prayed for his appointment as clerk on regular basis with
immediate effect. The Tribunal granted the prayer with a condition that the
applicant should qualify the typing test within one year. The order of the
Tribunal is dated 27.3.1995.
respondent Ms. Parveen Kumari is the daughter of late Shri Om Prakash, who was
serving as a driver in the Corporation. He died on 2.11.1991. The respondent
submitted application seeking employment under kith and kin policy.
deceased left behind him his wife and daughter. The Corporation settled the
monetary compensation due to the deceased by way of family pension, gratuity,
provident fund, leave encashment, etc. Under the scheme of appointment for kith
and kins of deceased the Corporation took a lenient view and approved the case
of the respondent for employment for the post of clerk on 27.5.1993 Her name
was included in the waiting panel.
Corporation has filed Annexure-I showing details of the candidates waiting for
appointments under kith and kin policy for the post of clerk. Shri Dinesh Kumar
is serial number 27 and Ms. Parveen Kumari, Is serial number 45.
to the Corporation, due to high incidents of bus accidents in the hill roads, The
death rate in the Corporation is very high whereas the availability of posts
are comparatively lesser. It is further stated that list of dependants and
claimants for appointment on kith and kin policy are very large. Since there
are only limited posts the Corporation is not in a position to accommodate all
of them in the permanent posts. It takes some time to provide the persons, who
are entitled under the kith and kin policy, with suitable Jobs. It is stated
with reference to Annexure- I that serial numbers 1 to 11 were absorbed as
clerk-cum- typists during 1994 on regular basis. 20 candidates, appearing at
serial numbers 12, 13, 15,16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31,
33, 34, and Shri Dinesh Kumar were absorbed on contract basis as
clerk-cum-typists in 1995. Shri Dinesh Kumar did not accept the post of a
regular conductor offered to him earlier on 31.12.1994. So he was appointed on
part-time basis as clerk-cum-typist.
to the Corporation Shri Dinesh Kumar will have priority number 16 for
appointment on regular basis.
Parveen Kumari is in waiting panel of kith and kin candidates awaiting
employment. In the waiting list her serial number is 45. As many as 35
candidates in waiting panel have been absorbed on contract basis. Ms. Parveen Kumari
is serial number 10 in the waiting panel. She has to wait for her chance. She
applied to the Tribunal for appointment as a clerk. The Corporation pleaded
that since there is no vacancy and her place is number 10 in the waiting list
for being appointed even on part-time basis, she has to wait. The Tribunal, by
order dated 6.3.1995, held that even if there is no suitable post for
appointment, a supernumerary post will be created to appoint the applicant and
the respondent Ms. Parveen Kumari should be appointed against that post.
both the cases the Tribunal has directed the Corporation to appoint the
respondents as clerks on regular basis. According to the Corporation, no vacant
post is available to absorb the respondents immediately on permanent basis. Shri
Dinesh Kumar is working on contract basis and his priority number to he
appointed on regular basis is 16.
Kumari is in waiting list, to be appointed on contract basis, and serial number
is 10 in that list.
for the Corporation submitted that in the absence of available posts the
Administrative Tribunal acted illegally in directing that the respondents
should be appointed on permanent basis forthwith. In the case of Ms. Parveen Kumari
the Tribunal has gone further and has stated that a supernumerary post may be
created to accommodate her to be appointed as a clerk.
are of the view that the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal acted
illegally and without jurisdiction, in passing the orders dated 27.3.1995 and
6.3.1995 and in directing that the respondents be appointed in the regular
clerical posts forthwith. In the absence of a vacancy it is not open to the
Corporation to appoint a person to any post. It will be a gross abuse of the
powers of a public authority tc appoint persons when vacancies are not
available. If persons are so appointed and paid salaries, it will be a mere
misuse of public funds, which is totally unauthorised. Normally, even it the
Tribunal finds that a person is qualified to be appointed to a post under the
kith and kin policy, the Tribunal should only give a direction to the
appropriate authority to consider the case of the particular applicant, in the
light of the relevant rules and subject to the availability of the post. It is
not open to the Tribunal either to direct the appointment of any person to a
post or direct the concerned authorities to create a supernumerary post and
then appoint a person to such a post. We are of the view that directions given
by the Administrative Tribunal, in these two appeals, are totally unauthorised
and illegal. We are, therefore, constrained to set aside the orders appealed
against. We hereby do so and allow the appeals. There shall be no order as to
Before concluding, we should record the factual position conceded by the
counsel appearing for the Corporation. It is stated that Shri Dinesh Kumar as
serial number 16 in the priority list for regular appointment as clerk and that
Ms. Parveen Kumari is serial number 10 for appointment in the waiting panel for
the post of clerk on contract basis. As and when vacancies arise for
appointment to such posts, the Corporation shall conform to the priorities
mentioned hereinabove in the matter of filling up the posts, subject to the
fulfillment of necessary qualifications by the candidates concerned.