Vs. Municipal Council, Tonk & Ors  INSC 1026 (27 August 1996)
K. Ramaswamy, K. Hansaria B.L. (J) Majmudar S.B. (J)
O R D
petitioner claims that he has been denied the salary for period from September 10, 1987 to August 18, 1988. He claims to have worked in the office of the Municipal
Council, Tonk. He filed writ petition in the High Court in February 1990. The
learned single Judge held that since it is a claim recoverable in a civil
action, the discretionary power under Article 226 of the Constitution is not
exercisable. Accordingly, he dismissed the writ petition. The same came to be
confirmed in the impugned order of the Division Bench made on May 6, 1996 in Special Appeal No.218/96. Thus, this special
not necessary for us to go into the question of the legality of the order of
the High Court in refusing to grant the relief. It is axiomatic that the
exercise of the power under Article 226 being discretionary, the learned single
Judge as well as the Division Bench Have not exercised the same to direct the
respondent to pay the alleged arrears of salary alleged to be due and payable
to the petitioner. Under these circumstances, the only remedy open to the
petitioner is to avail the action in the suit.
the limitation has run out to file a civil suit by now, which was not so on the
date of the filing of the writ petition, the civil Court is required to
exclude, under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the entire time taken by
the High Court in disposing of the matter from the date of the institution of
the writ petition.
for application of Section 14, the Court dealing with the matter in the first
instance, which is the subject of the issue in the later case, must be found to
have lack of jurisdiction or other cause of like nature to entertain the
matter. However, since the High Court expressly declined to grant relief
relegating the petitioner to a suit in civil Court, the petitioner cannot be
left remedyless. Accordingly, the time taken in prosecuting the proceedings
before the High Court and this Court obviously pursued diligently and bona fide,
needs to be excluded. The petitioner is permitted to issue notice to the
Municipality within four weeks from today. After expiry thereof, he could fine
suit within two months thereafter. The trial Court would consider and dispose
of the matter in accordance with law on merits.
special leave petition is disposed of accordingly.