Medical Officer Vs. Khadeer Khadri  INSC 32 (10 January 1995)
K. Ramaswamy, K. Manohar Sujata V. (J)
1995 AIR 850 1995 SCC (2) 82 JT 1995 (1) 453 1995 SCALE (1)191
Admittedly, the respondent joined the service on 15-11- 1951, and had given his
date of birth as 14-1-1953 (sic 1933). In 1991, on his making
a representation to the Corporation claiming that his date of birth is 15-7-1934, his request for correction was turned down. He
filed OA No. 48263 of 1991 before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. By the impugned order dated 8-10-1993, the Tribunal allowed the petition and directed to
make the correction. Thus this appeal by special leave.
doubt, sub-rule (5) of Rule 2 of the Andhra Pradesh Public Employees (Recording
and Alteration of Date of Birth) Rules, 1984, + From the Judgment and Order
dated 8-10-1993 of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, in O.A. No.
48263 of 1991 83 provides power for correction of the bona fide mistake in
recording the date of birth. It cannot be said that it is a clerical mistake.
The date of birth having been given and recorded in the service register as
early in 1951, it was not a bona fide mistake. The respondent claimed that he
discovered the mistake in 1991 that his date of birth instead is 15-7-1934 but it was recorded as 14-11-1933.
is only a ruse to get over the bar of limitation to have the date of birth
entered in the service record corrected. The rules prescribe the procedure for
laying the application within three years from the date of entering into
service. In 1976, executive instructions were issued for correction of date of
birth which were replaced by statutory rules issued in 1984. The latter also
prescribes the procedure. He did not avail of the opportunity when, twice, it
was available to him to have it corrected. It would clearly show that
subsequent belated attempt is not a bona fide one but to have the correction
made to his advantage after the bar of limitation created by the rules.
Tribunal has not properly considered the matter in this perspective. The appeal
is allowed. OA stands dismissed.