S.P. Vaithianathan Vs. K. Shanmuganathan 
INSC 283 (4 May 1994)
Ahmadi, A.M. (J) Ahmadi, A.M. (J) Venkatachala
CITATION: 1994 AIR 1771 1994 SCC (4) 569 JT 1994
(2) 689 1994 SCALE (1)855
1. We need not dilate upon the previous history
of this case. Suffice to state that on 6-4-1994 when the appeals had come up
for hearing, this Court directed the respondents to produce the record and also
a responsible officer to file an affidavit whether the disputed land is still needed
for a public purpose being a suitable one or there is no other better land
available to establish taluq office at Thiruvaiyaru. Pursuant thereto, an
affidavit has been filed by one G.V. Suresh, RDO, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu in
which it is stated that the Government had proposed to open a sub- treasury at Thiruvaiyaru.
In view of the fact that sub- taluk was elevated to the status of regular taluk
they needed larger buildings, there being congestion in the existing building
and the Commissioner for Land Revenue along with the District Collector and
other officers, when inspected different lands and identified the present lands
as suitable for taluk office and sub-treasury office.
Accordingly the proceedings for acquisition, it
is stated, were initiated.
2. In the record produced, a plan is available.
From that plan it would appear that the existing taluk office is situated on
the west of the main road + From the Judgment and Order dated 18-12-1989 of the
Madras High Court in W.A. Nos. 1069 and 1070 of 1989 569 and to the east of the
main road, apart from the built-up town, there are large open areas available
The land in question admittedly, is situated at
a place far away from the place where taluk office is found and is in a
deviation road leading to Kumbhakonam. It is also stated by the appellants that
to the north of this area an extent of 18 acres of land is still available for
3.From the report of the Commissioner for Land
Revenue, it becomes clear that initially a proposal was made to acquire 20
acres of land as a compact block to establish Raja's College of Music with all attendant
facilities and 5 acres of land for establishing taluk office, sub-treasury
office, sub-jail etc. It would appear that the lands needed for the
construction of the music college are no longer needed. It becomes also clear
that in the present land there is a well-developed coconut tope, paddy and
sugarcane fields. They are situated at lower level than the road by 2 to 3
feet. We do not propose to go into the controversy whether the proceedings to
acquire land for music college were pursued or dropped as being unnecessary for
the purpose of this case.
4.The Commissioner appears to have been
persuaded with the idea of the Collector to acquire the entire land for putting
up a compact block and their extensions of Raja's College of Music with attached
facilities etc. In view of the fact that major part of the proposal appears to
have not been pursued, the proposal to have a compact block no longer subsists.
Considered from this perspective and in view of the fact that on the main road
there are other agricultural open lands available for acquisition either to the
north or to the south of the taluk office abutting the main road, we find that
there would be no justification for proceeding with the acquisition of the
lands in question. The notification issued and published on 23-7-1981 is accordingly quashed,
as regards the lands in question. It is needless to mention that it is open to
the authorities to acquire any other lands suited for the purpose of
establishing the regular taluk office and other offices.
The appeals are allowed.
5. In the circumstances, the parties are
directed to bear their own costs.