Rajasthan Vs. Gopal Singh  INSC 357 (17 September 1993)
A.M. (J) Ahmadi, A.M. (J) Venkatachala N. (J)
1994 SCC Supl. (2) 404
respondent, a Police Constable, was dismissed from service on certain charges.
He filed a writ petition in the High Court which was heard by a Division Bench
of the High Court comprising two learned Judges. The Division Bench by its
judgment and order dated 1-2-1989, dismissed the writ petition.
Against that the delinquent filed a review application which was heard by one
of the Judges, constituting the Division Bench, presumably because the second
learned Judge was not available. In such a situation under Rule 64 of the Rules
of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, 1952, the proper procedure to be
followed was to lay the application before the learned Chief Justice, who with
due regard to the provisions of Rule 5 of Order 47 of the Code will constitute
a Bench for hearing and disposal of such application. In the instant case
unfortunately this procedure was not followed but one of the learned Judges
constituting the Division Bench which disposed of the main petition exercised
power of review and reversed the earlier order. The effect of this * Corrected
on September 20 1993 405 order is that a matter which
would ordinarily go to a Division Bench came to be disposed of by a learned
Single Judge. That clearly was not in keeping with a Rule 64 of the Rules of
the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, 1952, read with Rule 5 Order 47 of
the Code of Civil Procedure.
therefore, set aside the order in review and remit the matter to the High
Court. The papers will be placed before the learned Chief Justice for
constituting a Bench of two learned Judges for disposal of the review petition.
The appeal is allowed accordingly with no order as to costs.