Ashwin Nanubhai Vyas Vs. State of
Maharashtra & ANR  INSC 212 (10 October 1966)
10/10/1966 HIDAYATULLAH, M.
CITATION: 1967 AIR 983 1967 SCR (1) 807
Code of Criminal Procedure (5 of 1898), ss.
198 and 495- Inquiry under Chapter XVIII requiring complaint by person
aggreived-Death of complainant after filing complaint-Effect-Power to
substitute another prosecution agency.
During the inquiry under Chapter XVIII in
respect of offences requiring a complaint by the person aggrieved, the
complaint died after the complaint had been filed under S. 198 Cr. P.C. The
application for substitution of the complainant was resisted by the
accused--appellant, on the ground that only the aggrieved person could be the
complainant and on the complaint's death, the complainant must be treated as
abated. The magistrate rejected the objection,and the High Court dismissed a
revision against it. In appeal to this Court.
HELD : The objection must be rejected.
Section 198 Cr. P.C. creates a bar which has
to be removed before recognisance is taken. Once the bar is removed because the
proper person has filed a complaint, the section works itself out. If any other
restriction was also there the Code would have said so. Not having said so, one
must treat the section as fulfilled and worked out. [811 D-E] Unless the Code
itself said what was to happen, the power of the Court to substitute another
prosecution agency (subject to such restrictions as may be found) under s. 495
of the Code was always available. [812 D-E] Case law discussed.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal
Appeal No. 268, of 1964- 11 I I Appeal by special leave from the judgment and
order dated' August 25, 1964 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Revision.
Application No. 333 of 1964.
N. N. Keswani for the. appellant.
K. L. Hathi and R. H. Dhebar, for respondent
K. Rajendra Chaudhuri and K. R. Chaudhuri,
for respondent No. 2.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
Hidayatullah, J. In this appeal, by special leave, against the judgment and
order of the High Court of Bombay, August 25, 1965, the appellant Ashwin
Nanubhai Vyas is an accused before the Presidency Magistrate's 4th Court at
Girgaon, Bombay. The case was started on the complaint under s. 198, Code of
Criminal 694 In the circumstances, the answer returned by the High Court to the
two questions referred to it has to be held to be incorrect. Both the questions
have to be answered against the assessee and in favour of the Commissioner of
Income- tax, so that the answer returned by the High Court to the two questions
is set aside, the first question is answered in the affirmative, and the second
in the negative. The appeal is accordingly allowed with costs in this Court as
well as in the High Court.
R.K.P.S. Appeal Allowed.