AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987


21. Presumption as to offences under Section 3.

  1. In a prosecution for an offence under sub-section (1) of Section 3, if it is proved,

  1. that the arms or explosives or any other substances specified in Section 3 were recovered from the possession of the accused and there is reason to believe that such arms or explosives or other substances of a similar nature, were used in the commission of such offence; or

  2. that by the evidence of an expert the fingerprints of the accused were found at the site of the offence or on anything including arms and vehicles used in connection with the commission of such offence.[12] [(c) * * *][13][(d) * * *]

  1. In a prosecution for an offence under sub-section 3 of Section 3, if it is proved that the accused rendered any financial assistance to a person accused of, or reasonably suspected of, an offence under that section, the Designated Court shall presume, unless the contrary is proved, that such person has committed the offence under that sub-section.



Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987  Back




Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered by nubia  |  driven by neosys