Specific Relief Act, 1963
14. Contracts not specifically enforceable
(1) The following contracts cannot be specifically enforced,
namely,-
(a) a contract for the non-performance of
which compensation is an adequate relief;
(b) a contract which runs into such minute or
numerous details or which is so dependent on the personal qualifications or
volition of the parties, or otherwise from its nature is such, that the court
cannot enforce specific performance of its material terms;
(c) a contract which is in its nature
determinable;
(d) a contract the performance of which
involves the performance of a continuous duty which the court cannot supervise.
(2) Save as provided by the Arbitration Act, 1940, no contract
to refer present or future differences to arbitration shall be specifically
enforced; but if any person who has made such a contract (other than
arbitration agreement to which the provisions of the said Act apply) and has
refused to perform it, sues in respect of any subject which he has contracted
to refer, the existence of such contract shall bar the suit.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (a) or clause
(c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1), the court may enforce specific
performance in the following cases:
(a) where the suit is for the enforcement of a
contract,-
(i) to execute a mortgage or furnish any other
security for securing the repayment of any loan which the borrower is not
willing to repay at once:
PROVIDED that where only a part of the loan has
been advanced the vendor is willing to advance the remaining part of the loan
in terms of the contract; or
(ii) to take up and
pay for any debentures of a company;
(b) where the suit is for,-
(i) the execution of a formal deed of
partnership, the parties having commenced to carry on the business of the
partnership; or
(ii) the purchase of a
share of a partner in a firm;
(c) where the suit is for the enforcement of a
contract for the construction of any building or the execution of any other
work on land:
PROVIDED that the following conditions are
fulfilled, namely,-
(i) the building or other work is described in
the contract in terms sufficiently precise to enable the court to determine the
exact nature of the building or work;
(ii) the plaintiff has a substantial interest
in the performance of the contract and the interest is of such a nature that
compensation in money for non-performance of the contract is not an adequate
relief; and
(iii) the defendant has, in pursuance of the contract, obtained possession of the whole or any part of the land on which the building is to be constructed or other work is to be executed.
