AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Indian Evidence Act, 1872


15. Facts bearing on question whether act was accidental or intentional

When there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional, 14[ or done with a particular knowledge or intention,] the fact that such act formed part of a series of similar occurrences, in each of which the person doing the act was concerned, is relevant.

 

Illustration

 

(a) A is accused of burning down his house in order to obtain money for which it is insured.

 

The facts that a lived in several houses successively, each of which he insured, in each of which a fire occurred, and after each of which fires. A received payment from a different insurance office, are relevant, as tending to show that the fires were not accidental.

 

(b) A is employed to receive money from the debtors, of B. It is As duty to make entries in a book showing the amounts received by him. He makes an entry showing that on a particular occasion he received less than he really did receive.

 

The question is, whether this false entry was accidental or intentional.

 

The facts that other entries made by A in the same book are false, and that the false entry is in each case in favor of A, relevant.

 

(c) A is accused of fraudulently delivering to B a counterfeit rupee.

 

The question is, whether the delivery of the rupee was accidental.

 

The facts that, soon before or soon after the delivery to B, A delivered counterfeit rupees to C, D and E are relevant, as showing that the delivery to B was not accidental.



Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Back




Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered by nubia  |  driven by neosys